Council: State of the University: The Year of Civic Engagement
At the University Council meeting on October 21, the annual State of the University presentations were given. The President’s portion focused on the Recovery Planning Group and COVID’s Impact on Penn (Almanac October 27, 2020).
The Provost’s portion of the State of the University appears below. It was introduced by Provost Wendell Pritchett and presented by Deputy Provost Beth Winkelstein, Director of New Student Orientation and Academic Initiatives David Fox, Oscar Gandy Professor of Communication & Democracy and the Faculty Director of the Stavros Niarchos Foundation Paideia Program Michael X. Delli Carpini, Professor of English and Africana Studies and Faculty Director of Civic House and the Civic Scholars Program Herman Beavers, Associate Vice President and Founding Director of the Barbara and Edward Netter Center for Community Partnerships Ira Harkavy, and student co-chairs of Penn Leads the Vote Harrison Feinman and Eva Gonzalez.
Wendell Pritchett
We announced in June, as many of you know, that this would be a special Year of Civic Engagement at Penn. Our panel is going to tell you about the wide range of civic engagement programs that we have at Penn. We were founded as a practical academy and this mission has been central to our work for hundreds of years. It is more important than ever to remember this year. This is in part because of the election, which is less than two weeks away, and we’re going to learn more in a few minutes about the amazing work of our students in Penn Leads the Vote in registering and mobilizing voters. But we also need to reaffirm that civic engagement is always at the heart of what Penn is about, even if we are dispersed around the world. We will learn more this afternoon about Civic House, the Netter Center, and the Paideia Program and how they advance these values.
I would also encourage you to think about three specific things that you can do—all of you—to embody these values. First, as you no doubt heard, voting on November 3rd – or before November 3rd, as I have done, if that’s your preference. Second, I encourage you all to get engaged in your communities, wherever you are right now. You don’t need to live on campus to practice civic engagement. It’s more important than ever for us to help our local communities stay vital and connected during the pandemic. Third, we will all be essential to revitalizing our city of Philadelphia and our neighborhood of West Philadelphia in the critical years ahead. So the Year of Civic Engagement urges us to look beyond this specific moment to the great history of Penn and Philadelphia and to the great future of Penn in Philadelphia. I’m now going to turn it over to my wonderful colleague, Deputy Provost Beth Winkelstein, who I want to thank, not only for being the impresario of many of these activities, but for all her leadership in standing up our educational program this year in a very challenging situation. She and our panelists will talk more about our defining commitment to Civic Engagement and the Year of Civic Engagement. So, without further ado, Dr. Winkelstein.
Beth Winkelstein
I will be super brief because we have a wonderful panel—a two-part presentation on the Year of Civic Engagement and then, as Provost Pritchett previewed, several really engaged and interesting panelists that I want you to hear from. As you’ve already heard, this is a Theme Year that we launched only a few months ago. But as the Provost just pointed out, this is something that is a longstanding tradition of commitment and investment and a practice here at Penn around civic engagement.
Today not only will we hear about the current moment, which is punctuated by the activities and the landscape around us and the Year of Civic Engagement, but we will also celebrate and share some of those longstanding and newly created programs here on campus and you’ll learn more from our panelists. For the first part of our presentation, I want to introduce David Fox, the Director of New Student Orientation and Academic Initiatives. David and his team have pulled off nothing short of—I won’t call it a miracle because it’s more than a miracle—but it’s a huge lift and a major pivot. Together with their office and our partners across campus, they rose to the challenge and launched the Penn Reading Project and a fulsome year of Theme Year activities, and they did this all online right when they were ready to turn the key on doing the prior year, which was to be the Year of Jazz. We hope to return to that Theme Year, perhaps as a fitting follow up to Civic Engagement, as there are a lot of themes that fit through both of those. But for now, I’d like to invite David and thank him and his team. He’ll update you about the Year of Civic Engagement and then I’ll return to introduce our panelists. David, thank you and your team.
David Fox
I intend to be very brief here and to let the video that was a great part of the Year of Civic Engagement do most of the talking for me. But I also wanted to echo Beth’s discussion of partnership we had—this was an extraordinary group of people who came together. I would say that the discussions which were weekly—this is an odd word to use in a sense about this time—but I found them often joyful and exhilarating and I could not have asked for a better team. You’re going to have the pleasure of meeting three of the keys players in this, but I would be remiss if I didn’t thank my partners—my teammates in New Student Orientation—Troy Majnerick and Andrea Naughton who did extraordinary heavy lifting here. Except it didn’t feel like heavy lifting. It felt exciting in every possible respect.
I’ll just focus on a couple of things that changed in the Penn Reading Project particularly, which was first salvo really in this Year of Civic Engagement. We obviously moved to an online format, which lasted a week rather than the kind of one event central day that we normally would do. All of the materials were made available through Canvas, which were a group of readings or short essays plus a 30-minute video. It was of major importance to us that students would be able to download these easily and access the materials on their own in whatever context that they would have them.
We opened the gates more widely to invite members of the entire Penn community—students, faculty, and staff—to take part as facilitators and get a chance to meet students in small groups. We had more than double the amount of volunteers that we normally had. We were able to have multiple facilitators for each group. We began the week and ended the week with a video. The video that we ended the week with, you’re about to see: https://youtu.be/q68G_XKVPxg. The video that we began the week with—I’m very grateful to Provost Pritchett for having done this—was the Provost’s Community Gathering, which as of an hour ago had 3,805 hits. We had an extraordinary number of people watch it in real time. As with many of the programs that we did in New Student Orientation, they’re available on our YouTube channel—a phrase I never thought I’d say at a meeting at Penn, but here I am saying it.
We also asked the students at the beginning of the Reading Project and at the end of the Reading Project to answer a question. At the beginning, we asked them to consider all of the materials that they looked at and talk about an idea that particularly spoke to them. At the end, we asked them how they would like to put that into practice because we saw that they were really—and this is the way I often phrase it—beginning with the Reading Project, not ending with it. With all of that said, I would like to now segue into the video that we made in partnership with Bowstring, which I think speaks to the year.
Beth Winkelstein
Thank you, David. I know you join me as we transition to the panel portion of this presentation. In thanking the panelists who we’ve just seen featured in the video, today we have in person three of those programs to talk through in more detail, and I’m very excited by the fact that we are joined by two of our students. I am going to introduce each of the panelists and then ask that they kick it off and then pass the baton to the next person.
We’re going to start with Michael Delli Carpini, the Oscar Gandy Professor of Communication & Democracy and the Faculty Director of the Stavros Niarchos Foundation Paideia Program. After him, we’re going to hear from Herman Beavers, Professor of English and Africana Studies and Faculty Director of Civic House and the Civic Scholars Program. Then Ira Harkavy, the associate vice president and founding director of the Barbara and Edward Netter Center for Community Partnerships. And, excitedly, we’re going to also have two students, Harrison Feinman and Eva Gonzalez, who are the student co-chairs of Penn Leads the Vote. Then we will conclude the panel and take questions. So, Michael, I will pass the microphone to you and express my gratitude to you and all of the panelists.
Michael X. Delli Carpini
Thank you Beth for the opportunity to talk about the SNF Paideia Program. I wanted to start off by saying it’s been a great pleasure and an honor to work with you, with David, with Herman, with Chaz, with Ira, and with the many others who have worked hard on the Year of Civic Engagement. The Paideia Program was established just last year through a five-year pilot grant from the Stavros Niarchos Foundation with the hopes that it will become a permanent part of Penn’s educational mission. Its central goal is to provide Penn undergraduates with the skills, knowledge, ethics, and motivations to engage in informed, robust, but respectful dialogue across the many ideological, demographic, identity-based, and regional divides that exist at Penn, in Philadelphia, in our nation, and across the globe. Doing so in a way that marries individual wellness with community wellness; that is, to educate the whole person and to educate citizens in the broadest and most inclusive sense of that term, which are the meanings of the ancient Greek concept of Paideia.
The program is still evolving and is intentionally experimental, but overall, we attempt to achieve the goals that I just mentioned through the following: Paideia-designated courses that are open to all Penn undergraduates: Paideia-sponsored or co-sponsored lectures, forums and workshops focusing on wellness, service, citizenship and dialogue; initiatives that address these issues in more focused areas; a Paideia fellows program, in which, beginning in their sophomore year, cohorts of 20 Penn undergraduates can have a more structured and immersive experience; and other collaborations, partnerships and network-building with the many other Penn entities whose missions focus on one or more aspects of wellness, service, citizenship and dialogue, with the goal of making the whole more than the sum of its individual parts. Let me talk very briefly about each of those five components.
While each course is unique in form and content, the overall purpose of the Paideia-designated courses is to examine deliberative democracy, civil discourse, and issues of conflict negotiation and cooperation to equip our students with ways to engage with diverse perspectives; to provide practical application for using these skills; to explore ethical approaches to engaged citizenship and civic leadership; and to investigate the relationship between individual wellness, civic engagement, and the community.
This next slide shows you a few examples of the courses that we have or will be offering soon. I want to mention though that we have many other courses that you can read about on our website. But I want to mention in particular that while these are credit-bearing courses, we are also working with other groups on a new preceptorial non-credit bearing course titled Racism and Anti-Racism in Contemporary America. This course will consist of 13 interdisciplinary panels featuring faculty, mostly Penn faculty from across the University, addressing the different ways in which race affects our health system, our educational system, our economic system, our political system, and so on. These panels are open not only to undergraduates, but to staff and faculty and to even interested people outside of Penn. The first of these panels will take place this coming Monday [October 26] at 5 p.m. I hope you have seen how to register for this course or individual panels through the many emails that we’ve sent out. But if you haven’t, please just go to the SNF Paideia website or the Year of Civic Engagement website to see how you can register. But that’s another example of the type of programming that we do through courses.
A second way in which we try to achieve our goals is through lectures, forums and workshops. Here is a list of a few that we have sponsored or cosponsored in the recent weeks and months. I just want to highlight one, the 2020 Silfen Forum that we cosponsored, which was a panel discussion on civil discourse in what are clearly uncivil times. It featured Jeb Bush, Julián Castro, Donna Brazile, Peggy Noonan, and Ashley Parker in a bipartisan discussion that was viewed live by over 1,000 members of the Penn community and has been viewed by over 10,000 people, I think, at last count, in its video form. If you’ve not seen it, it’s a great example of civil dialogue and you can access the video of it on the Silfen Forum website.
The third way in which we try to achieve our goals is through more specific initiatives. The first is the Red and Blue Exchange, funded generously by the Gamba family. This is a combination of speaker series, student forums, and the SNF Paideia-designated course Can We Talk to promote productive and effective dialogue across different ideological perspectives. The second initiative that I’ll highlight is the Penn Public Interest Technology initiative. This is part of a multi-university collaboration attempting to bring together issues of social justice and civil engagement with technology expertise so that technology can be used to serve the public interest, broadly defined.
Our fourth way of trying to achieve our goals is through the Paideia Fellows program that I mentioned. These are student cohorts that are provided with a more immersive experience through seminars that only Paideia fellows can take in their sophomore and junior years; three additional Paideia-designated courses that each fellow chooses in consultation with an advisor, based on his or her interests and major; an optional internship program; and a capstone project that connects a student’s major to some issue of wellness, service, citizenship and dialogue. We have our first cohort of sophomore fellows this year, and we’re very excited about working with them over the next three years. You can read more about them on our website. Finally, but equally importantly, we try to do what we do through collaborations and partnerships. Many of the groups you’re going to hear about today—Civic House, the Netter Center, the Andrea Mitchell Center, Penn in Washington, Wellness at Penn, the Fox Leadership—are all really important programs and centers that do great work in the area of civic engagement. What we strive to do is not only work with them, but serve as a way of networking these efforts together so that the great work that goes on at Penn in the area of civic engagement can be foregrounded and more effective because we are working as a group.
Let me end with a slide that shows the Paideia staff. We have a great staff, and great space in College Hall—renovated space—that unfortunately we have not been in as a group yet except to walk through it! We’re hopeful that when we’re back on campus, you will visit us there. You can also visit us in the meantime virtually by going to our website, by attending our events and courses, and by signing up for our social media. We really look forward to working with you and others over the course of the next years. Aspirationally, we hope that our program, in collaboration with the other programs you’re hearing about, will make Penn a place where students decide to come because they want to be part of the open exchanges, civic engagement, and diversity of thought, of people, and of conversation that our university is known for. Thank you very much. I will pass it on to my friend Herman now.
Herman Beavers
It’s a pleasure to be here and in particular to be with my colleagues Michael and Ira and David. I’m here to talk about Civic House. You’re looking at Civic House, which is on Locust Walk, and I can tell you in my time as faculty director I have not spent one second in the building. But I’m hoping next semester that will change. But as you can see, it’s a structure that is very easy to fall in love with, and I have definitely fallen in love with the structure. Civic House has its beginnings, I would like to say, in student protests in the 1960s and student protests that recognized the necessity of connecting not only the sort of political disputes around the Vietnam War, but connecting that discussion to how Penn performed as a citizen in West Philadelphia. And so, I come to Civic House knowing that it has a long tradition of engagement both at the level of theory but also at the level of practice.
One thing that I will say is that we’re happy that this is the Year of Civic Engagement. But at Civic House every year is the Year of Civic Engagement for us. One of the challenges for us this year was to figure out how we could continue to partner with our community organizations affiliated with the program in a way that continued to foreground their concerns and their agendas even as we participate in the Year of Civic Engagement. What has been a really wonderful thing to experience is the way that our Civic Scholars have come to internalize vocabulary of community engagement and the vocabulary of liberatory praxis.
We try very hard to immerse our students in conversations about privilege and oppression and power, and that would be particularly relevant in this moment, where students are really interested in pressing against the idea of systemic racism. But, to do that, we try and get at the root causes of social issues. And so we try very hard to have a conversation in the house as a whole about what are the ways that our individual organizational and institutional identities contribute to some of the root causes. And then we try and develop a praxis through which to enhance critical thinking that leads us to begin to undo the damage caused by the root causes of social issues.
We’re very interested in pushing our students to think about the different ways to achieve justice. In some instances, that is sitting in a room with our community partners listening. In other instances, it’s sitting with our community partners and offering input. But what is always the case is that we are always about trying to achieve mutually beneficial collaborations with community members.
One of the things that I think we are going to try and pull off this year is a discussion about systemic racism, but also about what my staff likes to call performative activism, and what’s the difference between really authentically-engaged partnerships and what are performative partnerships.
Our collaborators in the community include a very diverse group of organizations, including the School District of Philadelphia, but also HIAS Pennsylvania, which originally stood for Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, but now they focus on any immigrants coming to the City of Philadelphia and the State of Pennsylvania. Asian Americans United is an organization that attempts to foreground the concerns of the Asian-American community in the Philadelphia. And then the Public Citizens for Children and Youth is an organization that really attempts to facilitate programming that helps children thrive in Philadelphia.
What I will say is that in the brief time that I’ve been faculty director at Civic House, we already have had really provocative conversations about what it means to be civically engaged. Our goal is produce students who for the rest of their lives are civically-engaged citizens who are committed to reflection and action at the same time. It has been a real pleasure to be involved with this, and it has been a real pleasure to be involved with Civic House at this particular time. With that, I’m going to turn it over to my buddy Ira Harkavy.
Ira Harkavy
First, I want to say how pleased I am to be here today. It has been a pleasure to work with David Fox, Michael Delli Carpini, and Herman Beavers. I actually miss our meetings on Friday. I looked forward to those 11 a.m. meetings. I understand, David, there’s one coming up next week, and I’m glad to hear that. They have been terrific, and the conversations have been stimulating. Working together on the Year of Civic Engagement has strengthened and solidified our long-term friendships.
I would like to do three things today: provide a very brief overview of the Netter Center; summarize what we’re doing in a remote environment, and show a video conversation that occurred between President Gutmann and me in 2017, on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the Netter Center.
The Netter Center has approximately 24 programs. We have a primary mission and that is creating democratic mutually-beneficial partnerships between Penn and the West Philadelphia community. We do that through three approaches. One approach is academically based community service (ABCS). These are credit-bearing courses, involving undergraduate, graduate, and professional students, that connect the University with the community. Currently there are approximately 75 courses offered per year with about 1,700 students participating. Although not all our programs work with schools, a large number do; and the approach we use is to develop university-assisted community schools (UACS). We work very deeply with nine schools in West Philadelphia. The idea is that we can provide comprehensive supports for those schools, supports that combine academic and volunteer resources. Approximately 3,000 undergraduate and graduate students engage with the Netter Center. This includes over 350 students in work-study and other paid internship positions, more than 900 volunteers, and 1,700 students in academically based community service courses. Most of these students work at university-assisted community schools to provide a program in which the schools are hubs and centers of neighborhoods, serving not only children but adults. We aggregate and integrate Penn resources to have maximum impacts on Penn student learning and academic work in general, as well as on the community.
We see academically based community service and university-assisted community schools as part of a larger strategy. One where Penn functions as a democratic anchor institution, which means combining the range of university resources, volunteer, academic, and institutional and economic, to work in democratic partnerships with our neighbors. We’ve been very fortunate to have an exceptionally strong relationship with Craig Carnaroli and the Executive Vice President’s Office, where we work together on issues of employment, purchasing, and community improvement. This work has been beneficial, we believe, both to the University and the community. And with all our work, we share what we do across the country and around the world so Penn serves as a model for how universities can work democratically with their communities.
And what’s happened when we’ve gone remote? We have 39 academically based community service courses, including four new courses, this term. These impressive numbers are the result of extraordinary work on the part of the Penn faculty, the students, and the Netter Center staff as well as our community partners. We also adapted a summer program that’s been going on since the early nineties to a virtual university-assisted community school program for youth in West Philadelphia in grades K to 12. We worked with 435 young people in a remote environment. The program also engaged 60 Penn undergraduates (some of whom were in academic internship programs doing research), who provided invaluable assistance. The summer program as well as the remote program that began during the spring term were quite successful. Two teachers commented that some of the best learning they’ve seen occurred in the spring and summer remote program. We’ve also developed a program called Nonprofit Connects. The Netter Center has for many years operated a free Nonprofit Institute for community members. Over the summer and into the fall, Wharton students have been working with 18 non-profit organizations. And I also should note that in an adult program, University-Assisted Community School Nights, we have implemented virtual programming that, in some cases, has had greater attendance than the program had when it was in-person.
It has been the Netter Center staff that made all this possible. They’ve always worked with unusual dedication, seriousness of purpose, and a deep value-oriented practice. But during this period, since we’ve gone remote, their work has become even more outstanding. I want to thank the 50 Netter Center full-time staff for their indispensable contributions.
Penn Leads the Vote—you’ll hear about them shortly—has also done terrific work over the spring and summer developing effective digital outreach. Thanks Harrison and Eva for your leadership; and thanks to Cory Bowman, the associate director of the Netter Center, for his great work with the PLTV students.
I’m going to turn now to the video. I should note that the video in part features the work of Larry Gladney, former professor of physics at Penn. As many of you know, Larry is now at Yale. However, there are many other Penn colleagues who engage in this work (some of whom are attending this meeting, including Herman Beavers and Melissa Wilde) who also have compelling stories that would have provided a similar message to that conveyed by Larry’s outstanding work.
(video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HFKa_WUlqM)
Thanks very much for watching the video and thank you, President Gutmann. It was a pleasure to be interviewed with you and have that conversation; and it’s a pleasure to be able to show the video to University Council.
I want to turn now to Harrison Feinman and to Eva Gonzalez, the two exceptional student co-chairs of Penn Leads the Vote.
Harrison Feinman
Eva and I are very grateful to have an opportunity to speak briefly about the work we’ve been doing this semester and we’re happy to answer any questions at the end. I’m Harrison and Eva is also with me and we are the co-directors of Penn Leads the Vote. We both have been involved with the organization in different forms since it was reestablished in 2018.
Penn Leads the Vote was reestablished in 2018 under the Netter Center, and our primary goal is to promote civic voter engagement on campus among students, faculty and staff, and all campus stakeholders, as well as census engagement in the rare one in ten years that is relevant. We believe that civic engagement is a crucial part of learning at Penn; not just among students, but faculty and staff as well.
Eva Gonzalez
Penn Leads the Vote was reestablished after the problem of Penn voter turnout in 2016 and before then, which was slightly lower than the average rate, as these data show. As Harrison mentioned, Penn Leads the Vote was founded in 2004 but it was dormant from 2014 until 2018, when the Netter Center reestablished PLTV to solve this problem.
Since 2018, we’ve made significant progress in improving civic engagement on campus and we’re hoping that we can continue this trend this fall. Two things I’ll point out is that we increased on-campus voter turnout by 484 percent in the fall of 2018, and we are hoping that we can increase this number even more in November. Also Penn is the only Ivy League school to be designated a voter friendly campus by NASPA and the Campus Vote Project.
Penn Leads the Vote has a team of 12 paid student-staff members and we have a few new positions this year that we’ve been really happy to include, which includes a diversity and inclusion coordinator, a communications fellow and a graduate student coordinator. This highlights that we’re really trying to engage with the whole Penn community. Beyond this staff, we also have 95 trained volunteers this semester.
Harrison Feinman
One thing I’d like to add here is this is by far an unprecedented high number for us, which we’re really ecstatic about, and it is part due to New Student Orientation. We’ve been really grateful that we were able to be a part of that this year. So Penn Leads the Vote focuses on a bunch of different areas. We kind of break them up into strategies. Our first one is when we are serving as the direct agent only. We’ll host in-person campus-wide events every year; National Voter Registration Day is our main one, an Election Day celebration and then various tabling. But everything this year has been digital. To address the needs in this digital environment and on social media or our website, Pennvotes.org, many schools have decided to launch a Canvas class, which is based off the content on our website. So it is easily accessible for students where they go every day—almost every hour—to access their courses. We also have partnered with a group called Motivote, which is a platform that allows us to support voting and create competition, which I will talk about. The goal here is to communicate with students through their various affiliations and just meet them where they are. Through that, we have built a lot of great partnerships.
Penn is a catalyst. Our primary method of reaching students is through the strategy called the first door knocking, which is where we support leaders to reach out to their peers and meeting folks where they are instead of having them come to us. A lot of this strategy comes from the data that Eva was speaking about. At least in 2016, the best predictor of whether or not a student would vote was actually their major. As you may imagine, political science students tended to vote at higher rate than most students. That informs everything we do. This year, we have three main buckets where we are a catalyst. The first one is through the Quaker Vote Project where we partner with student organizations to make sure they have the tools they need to encourage voting, such as hosting events. We have about 50 organizations so far and we also provide money so groups can put on their own civic engagement events. Most recently we gave $500 to the Muslim Student Association. We also have the more involved VEC, where we have student leaders from across campus and large student organizations help steer our mission to make sure that we are engaging everyone in the most effective way and our reaching all corners of campus, and then Motivote, which I mentioned is the gamification of voting. We have partnered with undergraduate schools and every undergraduate is participating in a competition. So the schools are competing to see who can get the most amount of points, which is basically based on how many folks are in the platform and in the competition. And athletics is running their own as well and the College Houses are hosting a friendly competition, I think the school one is a little more competitive.
Penn Leads the Vote is also the advocate and we work a lot to make sure voting can be as accessible as possible. We work a lot with the Office of Government Affairs and other groups that are doing this work in Pennsylvania nationally to try to make voting more accessible to everyone. Some of the stuff we have advocated before in the past includes primary day changes, early voting, a streamlined down process. A lot of changes we’ve advocated for have been lately enacted by the state but there’s definitely some room to get out and we are paying attention to the results of this election to see how that can affect our work in this bucket later.
Eva Gonzalez
Our fourth strategy is Penn Leads the Vote as the connector. This is where we forge and strengthen a local network of organizations in universities, both in the West Philadelphia community, Pennsylvania at large, in addition to the greater Ivy League community. I’ll point out our work with the Pennsylvania Student Voting Coalition, which I’ve helped to develop this past semester, and is really crucial for statewide advocacy work.
Our fifth strategy is Penn Leads the Vote as an academic partner, which includes our work with ABCS courses. Another really great initiative in this area is our partnership with Professor Emily Falk in the Falk Lab to do more psychology-based research this semester. We’ve also worked with the Year of Civic Engagement programming and the Paideia Program.
Lastly, we hosted an event with PORES on National Registration Day and hope to further these partnerships.