According to a new qualitative study from the University of Pennsylvania and Northwestern University, a criminal record can stay with an individual long after a case finishes, regardless of how minor the crime, whether charges were dismissed without a conviction and whether that person’s rehabilitation efforts were successful. This is particularly true in a digital age that makes such records much more accessible to potential employers, landlords and others.

The researchers, Charles Loeffler of Penn and Simone Ispa-Landa of Northwestern, published their findings in the August issue of the journal Criminology.

To better understand the experience of someone in today’s economy living with a criminal past, they went to a walk-in clinic working to help people wipe clean their records. Individuals there received information about the research, then had the chance to participate in a 30- to 45-minute interview while waiting to begin the expungement process. During the research period, summer 2012, Drs. Loeffler and Ispa-Landa spoke to 53 men and women ages 17 to 60 from a range of backgrounds.

“Recruiting participants at the clinic provided us considerable variation in the seriousness of what people had been arrested for and charged with, as well as what remedies they’d be eligible for. We focused on their subjective experiences,” said Dr. Loeffler, the Jerry Lee Assistant Professor of Criminology. “We wanted to understand how their experiences differed depending on the extent of their criminal record.”

The researchers gathered information on how criminal records intersected with factors such as housing, education and employment. They found individuals with a criminal record faced challenges in finding employment no matter the extent or seriousness of the record.

“You might predict that individuals with more substantial records would be subject to greater amounts of screening and stigma,” Dr. Loeffler said. “Instead, now you have a more uniform stigma, certainly in the employment sector, that adheres to people regardless of the extent of the criminal record.”

The researchers hypothesize the reason is twofold: One, employers can more easily find criminal records than ever before. Rather than needing to visit a physical location for this information, they can access it online. Second, larger national corporations do a significant amount of entry-level hiring, and it is likely the organizations with across-the-board guidelines that work against someone in this situation. 

According to Dr. Loeffler, understanding how individuals experience living with a criminal record today can help inform contemporary policy conversations like Ban the Box and automatic expungement provisions designed to minimize collateral consequences of contact with the criminal justice system.